Those who listen to propaganda outlets might think an attack on Iran is imminent, just waiting for Trump's signal. However, examining both regional conditions and Israel's internal situation does not suggest an Israeli strike is near. All these reports appear to be political spin designed for domestic purposes in Israel.

Let's begin with the regional context. It's impossible to attack Iran's nuclear facilities without Saudi coordination – not because Israel needs an air corridor over Saudi airspace, but because Iran might retaliate not against Israel, but against Saudi Arabia's oil facilities and petrochemical industry, potentially triggering a global energy crisis and ecological disaster for Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia understands this well, which explains their rush to Tehran to establish military cooperation in the Gulf. In other words, they're not on Israel's side but on Iran's should an attack occur.

This means that until an effective defense system is deployed in Saudi Arabia to protect oil and petrochemical facilities, an Israeli attack is unfeasible – even at a time when the Air Force controls the "Air Force Arc" (formerly the Shiite Arc), and Iran's nuclear facilities are exposed to attack.

The problem lies within Israel. There's an inherent contradiction between the state's war objectives and those of the government, which prevents an attack on Iran.

The state defined its goals as "dismantling Hamas's military and political infrastructure and returning the hostages."

After the IDF – Air Force and ground forces – completed the first war objective, and now the state needs to focus on freeing the hostages, the government's contradictory war aims surface, primarily centered on achieving an "absolute victory" for the "brave lions," completing the regime revolution, and the "Kahanization" of the IDF.

It's no coincidence that Saudi Arabia explicitly demands the removal of Ben Gvir and Smotrich from the government to progress with Israel.

But there's more. It turns out the published coalition agreements aren't the real ones. The actual agreements block peace with Saudi Arabia and consequently prevent an attack on the nuclear facilities.

The real agreements include Ben Gvir's demand for a synagogue on the Temple Mount and Smotrich's "decisive plan" for the West Bank. Add to this the updated settlement plans in Gaza.

Smotrich is currently focused on deploying a settlement network in the West Bank that would thwart Trump's Palestinian state map.

To advance with Saudi Arabia toward an attack on Iran, Israel needs to offer something "tangible" regarding the Palestinian issue – and it can't be a synagogue on the Temple Mount or undermining Trump's plan.

The current focus on ending the war and returning hostages through a "surrender deal" with Hamas doesn't align with the government's war objectives. And if – heaven forbid – at this stage, the "anarchist, Kaplan-protest pilot" were to eliminate the nuclear sites, granting absolute victory to the Air Force rather than the "brave lions," the state would win the war, but the government would lose it.

So why are all the propaganda outlets loudly trumpeting an "attack on Iran"? As usual, it's spin. Netanyahu wants to create the impression that we're supposedly on the verge of a decisive strike against Iran, therefore the  pilots should stay in their cockpits rather than return to Kaplan protests.

Netanyahu knows well that the pilots care more about the state than he does, and he doesn't hesitate to push the limits as far as he can.

How far can he go? That's the question. The answer might lie with Trump.